大学英语作文:A Diet Rich 油腻的饮食

In this argument ,the arguer concludes that a diet rich in dairy products may increase,instead of decreasing the risk of osteoporosis,alluding that we should limit the consume of such products for healths sake,To support this conclusion, the arguer cites the result of a study that those who have consisitantly consumed dairy products are more vulnerable than others to bone fracture,and fracture is a symptom of osteoporosis,hence more vulnerable to osteoporosis.It seems reasonable at first glance,a close examination with it ,however,will reveal several inherent flaws of it. In the first place, the argument is based on a gratituous assumption that osteoporosis equals bone fracture, which is unwarrented.As we know; there may be alternative reasons such as sports and traffic accidents that cause bone fracture. Unless a convincing survey with the reasons of bone fractures of the individuals involved in the study is proposed that all fractures are caused by osteoporosis,the study will lend little support to the argument for its own representiveness is suspected. In addition, the arguer fails to takes into saccount the age, hobby and other relevent background of the individuals who participated the study.It is not just diary products that matter.Its possible, even probably, that those who like mounting as well as diary products.Its obvious that those climbers are more vulnerable to bone fracture, how can we owe the fracture to the diary products that he ate in the morning? Finally,the arguer ignores other factors such as genes,surroundings and habits that may have some bearings on osteoporosis,To trace the causes of osteoporosis to any single reason is to be miss the wood for the trees. To sum up, the argument is unconvincing due to several reasons state above .To Stength the argument, the arguer should estabish a causal relation beteween osteoporosis and bone fracture, to make the argument more cogent, the arguer should initiate a survey with those people to determine that if the diary products are the genuine reason for fracture.Unless the arguer do these, the argument is not acceptable.

在这场争论中，arguer认为，饮食中含有丰富的乳制品可能增加，而不是减少骨质疏松症的风险，暗指我们应该限制消费类产品的健康的缘故，支持这一结论，arguer引用的结果的研究，那些谁坚持认为食用奶制品的更容易受到比其他骨折，骨折是骨质疏松症的症状之一，因此更容易患骨质疏松症。它似乎合理乍一看，仔细检查它，然而，将揭示一些固有的缺点。首先，争论是基础上gratituous假设，骨质疏松症等于骨骨折，这是unwarrented。正如我们所知道的；有可能被替代的原因，如体育和交通事故，导致骨折。除非提出，所有骨折引起的骨质疏松症，研究将借一点支持自己的代表性的论点令人信服的调查与骨折的研究中所涉及的个人原因是怀疑。此外，arguer未到需要为saccount年龄，爱好和其他相关背景的个人参加研究。它不只是奶制品，这件事。可能的话，甚至有可能，，那些谁安装以及乳制品。很明显，那些登山者更易发生骨骨折，如何我们可以欠骨折日记产品，他吃早晨？最后，arguer忽略了其他因素，如基因，环境和习惯，可能会有一些轴承的骨质疏松症，微量的骨质疏松症的原因，任何单一的原因是被错过的树木的木材。综上所述，论证是不能令人信服的由于几个原因以上的国家。退变性争论，arguer应该TMJOA的因果关系beteween骨质疏松和骨折，使论证更有说服力，arguer应该发起一项调查，那些人确定，如果乳制品是断裂的真正原因。除非arguer做这些，争论是不可接受的